Stefan_E hat geschrieben:Over at Topaz, there is a discussion about the compatibility of ReMask. If you shoot a lot of photos, it makes a lot of sense to have this feature. I hope there are enough photographers using PL who will discover DeNoise's ability to compensate for shooting at higher speeds and request the batch file function in PL. Because the current publisher of the program has done little in the way of innovation with the software, this ability likely dates back to version 9 of PSP, when the original developer owned it. I fired up my PSPP X3 (32-bit) and found the Topaz plugins will run automatically in a batch file when recorded in a script (action). They work in a PL batch file, but not correctly, opening on each image for selection of settings.Ī communication about this bug with PL Support brought a prompt reply, indicating the recoding necessary to solve the problem would be complex and leaving me with the impression it's unlikely to happen. The new versions of the Topaz filters (except ReMask) are designed to run automatically in batch files, too.
Epaperpress ptlens license skin#
(Since downloading 64-bit versions of my plugins, I open Pl 32-bit only for comparison if I encounter a problem.)Īlien Skin Eye Candy 6 - used for assistance in web and print designĪlien Skin Xenofex 2 - web and print designĪlien Skin Image Doctor 2 - photo editing (Smart Fill of this set is my most often used plugin)įlaming Pear SuperBladePro - web and print designĪll of these plugins run efficiently in PL when you work on an individual image file. Here are the plugins that I use in PhotoLine 16.11, 64-bit. PanoTools: Adjust, Correct, Perspective, Remap (some do something but I don't really understand what's going on) PanoTools: Adjust, Correct, Perspective, Remap (some do something but I don t really understand what's going on)įreebies - a bunch of freebies such as B/W, Luma Negative, Chroma Negative, from the Pluginsite show in the Photowiz sub-menu, but don't work).ĪKVIS Multibrush (had this on evaluation, eval now run out, so can't check absolutely that it works)įixer Labs: Focus, Noise, Shadow Fixer, True blurįocus Magic: Fix Motion Blur, Fix out-of-focus Blurįlaming Pear: A bunch of freebie plug-ins, some of which work and others of which appear not to workĪlien Skin Image Doctor: JPEG repair, scratch remover, spot lifter, smart fillĪlien Skin Splat: a range of special effects, most quite useless! Plug-ins which show in the menu but don't work: So a lot of the plug-ins are ignored in those two settings.ĮPaperPress: PTLens (corrects camera lens distortion)
Epaperpress ptlens license 64 Bit#
What shows in the the Filters menu with PL set to 32+Rosetta represents everything in the Plug-ins folder and therefore what is available to PL in the 64 bit and 32 bit settings also. I have a whole bunch of plug-ins in the plug-ins folder which PL shares with Canvas X (most came free, so I just dumped them in, but to be honest, I almost never try them let alone use them I'll dump some of them out after looking t them critically as I have just done!). No doubt we would use Topaz Adjust in different ways which would be interesting, and it would give Gerhardt and Martin and idea of some things they needed to keep an eye on. If 27 of us are using Topaz Adjust, fine, it would be good if 27 said so. Would anyone care to list what works for them? And let's not worry about duplicating listings. It would be great to have a comprehensive listing of what plug-ins work with PL and what don't, on which platforms, and what the plug-ins do, and what we do with the plug-ins. So plug-ins are good - they can add functionality you want without making for extra cost and bloat for everyone else who don't want that functionality. Building and maintaining the database of hundreds of legacy lenses simply is not something someone can do in their spare time! And it is not something you would want Martin and Gerhard doing instead of developing the core functions of PL. If you go to the PTLens website you'll see the reason why a plug-in like that is a plug-in rather than a native part of programs. One example of this is one I've mentioned on another thread - Kekus's LensFix, and its "friendly competitor" (they use the same database), PTLens. Only a limited number of users of any given graphics program would use them, so they would not be worth developing for any single program (except something with the 500 kg gorilla market characteristics of P'shop, of course) but they are worth developing for users across many programs. There are simply some things which are quite specialized and it would be stretching program developers unnecessarily to include them. Now, I tend to have pretty limited demand for them but there is no doubt that there is room for plug-ins.
0 kommentar(er)
